Menu
GeneBe

1-220182922-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_012414.4(RAB3GAP2):c.2008C>G(p.Leu670Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000722 in 1,611,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00075 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

RAB3GAP2
NM_012414.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.381
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAB3GAP2 (HGNC:17168): (RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the RAB3 protein family, members of which are involved in regulated exocytosis of neurotransmitters and hormones. This protein forms the Rab3 GTPase-activating complex with RAB3GAP1, where it constitutes the regulatory subunit, whereas the latter functions as the catalytic subunit. This gene has the highest level of expression in the brain, consistent with it having a key role in neurodevelopment. Mutations in this gene are associated with Martsolf syndrome.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0051136017).
BP6
Variant 1-220182922-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-220182922-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211984.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-220182922-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000486 (74/152262) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0147 (71/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.012. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAB3GAP2NM_012414.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2008C>G p.Leu670Val missense_variant 20/35 ENST00000358951.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAB3GAP2ENST00000358951.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2008C>G p.Leu670Val missense_variant 20/351 NM_012414.4 P2Q9H2M9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000493
AC:
75
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0149
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00154
AC:
385
AN:
250568
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00201
AC XY:
272
AN XY:
135482
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000654
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000746
AC:
1089
AN:
1458864
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00103
AC XY:
750
AN XY:
725988
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000505
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000912
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000486
AC:
74
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000685
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000214
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000982
ExAC
AF:
0.00171
AC:
208
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 05, 2014- -
Warburg micro syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Martsolf syndrome;C3280214:Warburg micro syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 15, 2023- -
Martsolf syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 22, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.052
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.66
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.022
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.67
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.29
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.041
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0051
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.6
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.58
N
REVEL
Benign
0.023
Sift
Benign
0.40
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.45
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.042
MVP
0.068
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
1.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.13

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201613456; hg19: chr1-220356264; API