1-230755383-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_006615.3(CAPN9):c.260C>T(p.Thr87Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000133 in 1,608,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006615.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPN9 | ENST00000271971.7 | c.260C>T | p.Thr87Ile | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 20 | 1 | NM_006615.3 | ENSP00000271971.2 | ||
CAPN9 | ENST00000354537.1 | c.260C>T | p.Thr87Ile | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 19 | 1 | ENSP00000346538.1 | |||
CAPN9 | ENST00000366666.6 | c.214-7270C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 17 | 1 | ENSP00000355626.2 | ||||
ENSG00000244137 | ENST00000412344.1 | n.380+39730G>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000326 AC: 8AN: 245310Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000301 AC XY: 4AN XY: 132708
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000139 AC: 202AN: 1456426Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 96AN XY: 724472
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.260C>T (p.T87I) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 2) of the CAPN9 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 260, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 87 to be replaced by an isoleucine (I). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at