1-231421877-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_022051.3(EGLN1):​c.12C>G​(p.Asp4Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00147 in 1,488,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D4G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 51 hom. )

Consequence

EGLN1
NM_022051.3 missense

Scores

1
1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.787

Publications

45 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EGLN1 (HGNC:1232): (egl-9 family hypoxia inducible factor 1) The protein encoded by this gene catalyzes the post-translational formation of 4-hydroxyproline in hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) alpha proteins. HIF is a transcriptional complex that plays a central role in mammalian oxygen homeostasis. This protein functions as a cellular oxygen sensor, and under normal oxygen concentration, modification by prolyl hydroxylation is a key regulatory event that targets HIF subunits for proteasomal destruction via the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex. Mutations in this gene are associated with erythrocytosis familial type 3 (ECYT3). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
EGLN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • erythrocytosis, familial, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant secondary polycythemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hemoglobin, high altitude adaptation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003653556).
BP6
Variant 1-231421877-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-231421877-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 225682.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00141 (214/151930) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0319 (163/5110). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0279. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 120 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 214 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022051.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
EGLN1
NM_022051.3
MANE Select
c.12C>Gp.Asp4Glu
missense
Exon 1 of 5NP_071334.1
EGLN1
NM_001377260.1
c.12C>Gp.Asp4Glu
missense
Exon 1 of 4NP_001364189.1
EGLN1
NM_001377261.1
c.12C>Gp.Asp4Glu
missense
Exon 1 of 4NP_001364190.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
EGLN1
ENST00000366641.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.12C>Gp.Asp4Glu
missense
Exon 1 of 5ENSP00000355601.3
ENSG00000287856
ENST00000662216.1
c.30+40561C>G
intron
N/AENSP00000499467.1
ENSG00000287856
ENST00000653908.1
c.30+40561C>G
intron
N/AENSP00000499669.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00141
AC:
214
AN:
151820
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00256
AC:
287
AN:
112318
AF XY:
0.00223
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00638
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000242
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00147
AC:
1970
AN:
1336516
Hom.:
51
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00150
AC XY:
993
AN XY:
662306
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
27656
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00493
AC:
146
AN:
29638
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
23178
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0451
AC:
1366
AN:
30264
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
135
AN:
73374
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33838
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
4
AN:
3874
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000181
AC:
192
AN:
1059690
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00231
AC:
127
AN:
55004
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
110
219
329
438
548
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00141
AC:
214
AN:
151930
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00162
AC XY:
120
AN XY:
74272
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00138
AC:
21
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0319
AC:
163
AN:
5110
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
10
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10526
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
17
AN:
67904
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
31
41
51
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000624
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00181
ExAC
AF:
0.00197
AC:
217

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Erythrocytosis, familial, 3 Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Jul 27, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not provided Benign:1
Jun 17, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

EGLN1-related disorder Benign:1
Aug 03, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.31
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.22
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.42
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.66
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.34
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0037
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.57
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N
PhyloP100
0.79
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.87
D
PROVEAN
Benign
0.070
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.31
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.086
T
Polyphen
0.010
B
Vest4
0.0070
MutPred
0.099
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0808)
MVP
0.47
MPC
1.6
ClinPred
0.023
T
GERP RS
3.5
PromoterAI
0.13
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.15
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186996510; hg19: chr1-231557623; COSMIC: COSV107466939; COSMIC: COSV107466939; API