1-231421877-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_022051.3(EGLN1):c.12C>G(p.Asp4Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00147 in 1,488,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D4G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022051.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- erythrocytosis, familial, 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant secondary polycythemiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hemoglobin, high altitude adaptationInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022051.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGLN1 | NM_022051.3 | MANE Select | c.12C>G | p.Asp4Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | NP_071334.1 | ||
| EGLN1 | NM_001377260.1 | c.12C>G | p.Asp4Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | NP_001364189.1 | |||
| EGLN1 | NM_001377261.1 | c.12C>G | p.Asp4Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | NP_001364190.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGLN1 | ENST00000366641.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.12C>G | p.Asp4Glu | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000355601.3 | ||
| ENSG00000287856 | ENST00000662216.1 | c.30+40561C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000499467.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000287856 | ENST00000653908.1 | c.30+40561C>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000499669.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00141 AC: 214AN: 151820Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00256 AC: 287AN: 112318 AF XY: 0.00223 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00147 AC: 1970AN: 1336516Hom.: 51 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 993AN XY: 662306 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00141 AC: 214AN: 151930Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00162 AC XY: 120AN XY: 74272 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Erythrocytosis, familial, 3 Benign:2
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.
not specified Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
not provided Benign:1
EGLN1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at