1-235677195-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000081.4(LYST):​c.10941-7C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00824 in 1,587,792 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0063 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0085 ( 83 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0003070
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.494

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]
LYST Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Chediak-Higashi syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 1-235677195-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235677195-G-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 235367.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00626 (951/152036) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0104 (50/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0092. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 456 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000081.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LYST
NM_000081.4
MANE Select
c.10941-7C>A
splice_region intron
N/ANP_000072.2
LYST
NM_001301365.1
c.10941-7C>A
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001288294.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LYST
ENST00000389793.7
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.10941-7C>A
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000374443.2
LYST
ENST00000697178.1
n.*6920C>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 49 of 52ENSP00000513163.1
LYST
ENST00000697178.1
n.*6920C>A
3_prime_UTR
Exon 49 of 52ENSP00000513163.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00626
AC:
951
AN:
151918
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00761
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00981
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00622
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00699
AC:
1753
AN:
250680
AF XY:
0.00759
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000986
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00716
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00906
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00858
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00720
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00845
AC:
12137
AN:
1435756
Hom.:
83
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.00869
AC XY:
6220
AN XY:
715820
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000850
AC:
28
AN:
32938
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00311
AC:
139
AN:
44680
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00721
AC:
187
AN:
25938
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000253
AC:
1
AN:
39584
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
986
AN:
85720
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00873
AC:
466
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0130
AC:
74
AN:
5706
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00900
AC:
9791
AN:
1088280
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00781
AC:
465
AN:
59530
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
600
1199
1799
2398
2998
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
348
696
1044
1392
1740
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00626
AC:
951
AN:
152036
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00614
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
59
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00406
AC:
62
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
17
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
50
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00761
AC:
80
AN:
10518
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00981
AC:
667
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00616
AC:
13
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
50
101
151
202
252
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00698
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00559
EpiCase
AF:
0.0101
EpiControl
AF:
0.00919

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 02, 2016
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:4
Mar 18, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

LYST: BP4, BS1, BS2

Apr 03, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Jan 24, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
0.49
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00031
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.034
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72761794; hg19: chr1-235840495; API