1-235759221-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.6632C>G(p.Pro2211Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 1,614,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P2211P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.794

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Chediak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004403591).

BP6

Variant 1-235759221-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235759221-G-C is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 525190.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0011 (168/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00395 (164/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00345. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 81 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000081.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	LYST	NM_000081.4	MANE Select	c.6632C>G	p.Pro2211Arg	missense	Exon 23 of 53	NP_000072.2
	LYST	NM_001301365.1		c.6632C>G	p.Pro2211Arg	missense	Exon 23 of 53	NP_001288294.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
LYST	ENST00000389793.7	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.6632C>G	p.Pro2211Arg	missense	Exon 23 of 53	ENSP00000374443.2
LYST	ENST00000489585.5	TSL:1	n.*466C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 23 of 23	ENSP00000513166.1
LYST	ENST00000489585.5	TSL:1	n.*466C>G		3_prime_UTR	Exon 23 of 23	ENSP00000513166.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00110

AC:

168

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00396

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

250946

AF XY:

0.000155

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000579

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000106

AC:

155

AN:

1461856

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000106

AC XY:

AN XY:

727226

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00427

AC:

143

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00110

AC:

168

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00109

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00395

AC:

164

AN:

41548

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

15258

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000146

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00112

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00295

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000280

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 18, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: LYST c.6632C>G (p.Pro2211Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 250946 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0031 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LYST causing Chediak-Higashi Syndrome phenotype (0.0011). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6632C>G in individuals affected with Chediak-Higashi Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 525190). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

LYST-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 02, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Oct 27, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.093

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

4.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.51

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.29

LIST_S2

Benign

0.58

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0044

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.41

PhyloP100

0.79

PrimateAI

Benign

0.28

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

REVEL

Benign

0.065

Sift

Benign

0.44

Sift4G

Benign

0.59

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.071

MVP

0.20

ClinPred

0.014

GERP RS

-2.4

Varity_R

0.032

gMVP

0.21

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over