1-235810533-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.285T>C(p.Asp95Asp) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000509 in 1,609,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000050 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0002514

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.45

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Chediak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 1-235810533-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235810533-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 1088059.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.45 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000081.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	LYST	NM_000081.4	MANE Select	c.285T>C	p.Asp95Asp	splice_region synonymous	Exon 5 of 53	NP_000072.2
	LYST	NM_001301365.1		c.285T>C	p.Asp95Asp	splice_region synonymous	Exon 5 of 53	NP_001288294.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
LYST	ENST00000389793.7	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.285T>C	p.Asp95Asp	splice_region synonymous	Exon 5 of 53	ENSP00000374443.2
LYST	ENST00000465349.5	TSL:1	n.836T>C		splice_region non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 5 of 12
LYST	ENST00000489585.5	TSL:1	n.285T>C		splice_region non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 5 of 23	ENSP00000513166.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000487

AC:

AN:

246368

AF XY:

0.0000447

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000870

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000803

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000501

AC:

AN:

1457724

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000510

AC XY:

AN XY:

725378

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33452

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44694

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39662

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

49876

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000594

AC:

AN:

1111578

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60338

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000807

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41450

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15280

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 09, 2019

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 18, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

May 10, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: LYST c.285T>C (p.Asp95Asp) alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.9e-05 in 246368 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not higher than the estimated maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in LYST causing Chediak-Higashi Syndrome (0.0011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.285T>C in individuals affected with Chediak-Higashi Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1088059). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.46

PhyloP100

2.5

Mutation Taster

=41/59

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00025

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.056

SpliceAI score (max)

0.11

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over