1-237500808-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.2301G>T​(p.Ser767Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000941 in 1,613,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S767S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00092 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.13

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 1-237500808-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237500808-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93477.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.13 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00117 (178/152278) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0305 (158/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0266. There are 7 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 95 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 178 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001035.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RYR2
NM_001035.3
MANE Select
c.2301G>Tp.Ser767Ser
synonymous
Exon 21 of 105NP_001026.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RYR2
ENST00000366574.7
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2301G>Tp.Ser767Ser
synonymous
Exon 21 of 105ENSP00000355533.2
RYR2
ENST00000661330.2
c.2301G>Tp.Ser767Ser
synonymous
Exon 21 of 106ENSP00000499393.2
RYR2
ENST00000609119.2
TSL:5
n.2301G>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 21 of 104ENSP00000499659.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00117
AC:
178
AN:
152160
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0304
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
628
AN:
249272
AF XY:
0.00234
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000452
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000991
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000917
AC:
1340
AN:
1461708
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000882
AC XY:
641
AN XY:
727134
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
8
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0304
AC:
1207
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000267
AC:
23
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000809
AC:
9
AN:
1111866
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00152
AC:
92
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
81
162
242
323
404
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00117
AC:
178
AN:
152278
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
9
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0305
AC:
158
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
6
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
17
25
34
42
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000595
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00145
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00779
AC:
27
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 25, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ser767Ser in exon 21 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2.6% (15/572) of Asi an chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (dbSNP rs117588730). Ser767Ser in ex on 21 of RYR2 (rs117588730; allele frequency = 2.6%, 15/572)

Oct 21, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Mar 15, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 26, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Nov 14, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The RYR2 c.2301G>T (p.Ser767Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 306/120764 control chromosomes (7 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0344308 (297/8626). This frequency is about 1377 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RYR2 variant (0.000025), strong evidence that this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign.

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jun 23, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
0.053
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-2.1
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117588730; hg19: chr1-237664108; COSMIC: COSV63703976; API