1-237610812-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.4734C>T​(p.Pro1578Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000529 in 1,611,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1578P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00052 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 1-237610812-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237610812-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43794.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.97 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000657 (100/152144) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000382 (26/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000267. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 42 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 100 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.4734C>T p.Pro1578Pro synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 105 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2 Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.4734C>T p.Pro1578Pro synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 105 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2 Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.4734C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 36 of 104 5 ENSP00000499659.2 A0A590UK06
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkc.4734C>T p.Pro1578Pro synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 106 ENSP00000499787.2 A0A590UKB7
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkc.4734C>T p.Pro1578Pro synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 105 ENSP00000499653.3 A0A590UJZ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000657
AC:
100
AN:
152144
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000938
AC:
230
AN:
245088
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000918
AC XY:
122
AN XY:
132940
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000667
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000667
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000351
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000516
AC:
753
AN:
1459264
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000551
AC XY:
400
AN XY:
725732
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00176
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000657
AC:
100
AN:
152144
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000565
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.00152
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
May 17, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Pro1578Pro in exon 36 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 4/6620 European Ame rican chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). Pro1578Pro in exon 36 of RYR2 (allele fr equency = 4/6620) ** -

Sep 17, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

RYR2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Feb 03, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The RYR2 c.4734C>T (p.Pro1578Pro) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 80/89090 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.001592 (79/49632). This frequency is about 29 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RYR2 variant (0.000055), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory/reputable database classified this variant as likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, due to the synonymous nature of this variant, the lack of predicted effect on splicing, and the relatively high frequency in the control population, this variant is classified as benign. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Mar 23, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 21, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
0.0080
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201880756; hg19: chr1-237774112; API