1-237614741-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.5613C>T(p.Asp1871Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000512 in 1,613,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.02

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RYR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 1-237614741-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237614741-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 138946.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.02 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00248 (378/152234) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00831 (345/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00758. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 178 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 378 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3 link	c.5613C>T	p.Asp1871Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 37 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7 link	c.5613C>T	p.Asp1871Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 37 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2
RYR2	ENST00000661330.2 link	c.5613C>T	p.Asp1871Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 37 of 106			ENSP00000499393.2
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.5613C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 37 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00248

AC:

378

AN:

152116

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00833

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000649

AC:

161

AN:

247970

AF XY:

0.000580

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00844

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000319

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000558

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000499

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000307

AC:

448

AN:

1461540

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000287

AC XY:

209

AN XY:

727026

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00938

AC:

314

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000756

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53380

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000639

AC:

AN:

1111746

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000629

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

125

156

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00248

AC:

378

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00239

AC XY:

178

AN XY:

74428

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00831

AC:

345

AN:

41538

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5166

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000162

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000945

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00155

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00288

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Mar 06, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 12, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 17, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Asp1871Asp in exon 37 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.8% (31/4108) of African American c hromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/E VS/; dbSNP rs116774472). -

not provided

Benign:5

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RYR2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Nov 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Aug 29, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.14

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.30

PhyloP100

-1.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over