1-237711741-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.10231-4T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000267 in 1,538,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004187
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0530

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 1-237711741-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237711741-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 167631.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000604 (92/152318) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00945 (49/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00735. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 24 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 92 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.10231-4T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 70 of 104 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.10231-4T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 70 of 104 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2
RYR2ENST00000661330.2 linkc.10231-4T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 70 of 105 ENSP00000499393.2
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.*1266-4T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 68 of 103 5 ENSP00000499659.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000604
AC:
92
AN:
152200
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00943
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000726
AC:
165
AN:
227240
AF XY:
0.000620
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000511
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000624
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00899
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000709
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000230
AC:
319
AN:
1386568
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000224
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
691794
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000156
AC:
5
AN:
32042
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000469
AC:
2
AN:
42660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25264
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00518
AC:
203
AN:
39192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000245
AC:
2
AN:
81710
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52632
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5432
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000381
AC:
4
AN:
1049982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00179
AC:
103
AN:
57654
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
27
41
54
68
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000604
AC:
92
AN:
152318
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000322
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
31
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00945
AC:
49
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.517
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
10
14
19
24
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000206
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000472
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00751
AC:
26
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The RYR2 c.10231-4T>C variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 67/58520 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0011449, which is approximately 21 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RYR2 variant (0.000055), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31337358) -

Mar 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RYR2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Nov 03, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Genetic testing: The patient had genetic testing via the Pan Cardio panel with the Ambry laboratory. The test included sequencing of 79 genes associated with hereditary arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies: ABCC9, ACTC1, ACTN2, AKAP9, ANK2, ANKRD1, BAG3, CACNA1C, CACNA2D1, CACNB2, CALR3, CASQ2, CAV3, CRYAB, CSRP3, DES, DMD, DSC2, DSG2, DSP, EMD, EYA4, FXN, GATA4, GLA, GPD1L, ILK, JAG1, JPH2, JUP, KCNE1, KCNE2, KCNE3, KCNH2, KCNJ2, KCNJ8, KCNQ1, LAMP2, LDB3/ZASP, LMNA, MYBPC3, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, MYOM1, MYOZ2, MYPN, NEBL, NEXN, NKX2.5, PDLIM3, PKP2, PLN, PRKAG2, PTPN11, RAF1, RBM20, RYR2, SCN1B, SCN3B, SCN4B, SCN5A, SGCD, SNTA1, TAZ, TBX1, TBX5, TCAP, TMEM43, TMPO, TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2, TPM1, TTN, TTR, TXNRD2, VCL. Results reported on April 10th, 2013 show that no disease-causing variants in genes associated with either long QT or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were found. Testing did identify several variants of uncertain significance: - ANK2 p.Arg996Gln (c.2987G>A, p.R996Q). Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance. Based on the data reviewed below we consider it a variant of uncertain significance. - ANK2 p.Leu3143Val (c.9427C>G, p.L3143V). Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance. Based on the data reviewed below we consider it a variant of uncertain significance. -RYR2 c.10231-4T>C. Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance, suspected benign. Based on the data reviewed below we consider it a variant of uncertain significance, probably benign. The available data on each of these is reviewed below. Given the large number of genes included on this panel and the large and variable nature of some of these genes, it is expected that most individuals (including individuals who don't have inherited cardiac disease) would have at least one and possibly several rare variants found with this test. As a result it is important to consider the data available on each variant to determine whether it is a disease-predisposing variant or one of the many benign rare variants that we all have. Testing also identified several missense variants in TTN: - TTN c.20722G>A p.V6908I. Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance. - TTN c.53083A>G p.T17695A. Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance. - TTN c.71996A>G p.N23999S. Ambry classifies this as a variant, suspected benign. It is unclear at this time what role, if any, TTN missense variants play in causing inherited cardiovascular disease. In general population samples there is a high prevalence of rare or novel TTN missense variants, making it likely that testing anyone with this panel would uncover such a variant. As such we would generally consider all TTN missense variants to be variants of uncertain significance. ANK2 p.Arg996Gln (c.2987G>A, p.R996Q) Ambry classifies this as a variant of uncertain significance. Based on the data reviewed below we consider it a variant of uncertain significance. The variant has not been reported in association with disease but it has been seen in one individual from a general population sample. It is unknown at this time whether this variant and the other ANK2 variant are on the same chromosome or opposite chromosomes. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be probably damaging and SIFT predicts it to be deleterious (per the Ambry report). The arginine at codon 996 is completely conserved across species, as are neighboring amino acids. In total the variant has been seen in 1 of ~7592 individuals from publicly available population datasets. The variant is not listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing P -

Jun 26, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.10231-4T>C in intron 70 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1.3% (61/4770) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Ag gregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs117180147). -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Mar 05, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 25, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 29, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.80
PhyloP100
-0.053
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00042
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.054
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117180147; hg19: chr1-237875041; API