1-237783871-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.12159G>A(p.Glu4053=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00216 in 1,613,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 8 hom. )
Consequence
RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous
NM_001035.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.370
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 1-237783871-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237783871-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43719.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr1-237783871-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-237783871-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.37 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152334) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00213 (145/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00185. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 89 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 176 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.12159G>A | p.Glu4053= | synonymous_variant | 90/105 | ENST00000366574.7 | NP_001026.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.12159G>A | p.Glu4053= | synonymous_variant | 90/105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | ENSP00000355533 | P1 | |
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.12180G>A | p.Glu4060= | synonymous_variant | 91/106 | ENSP00000499787 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.12147G>A | p.Glu4049= | synonymous_variant | 90/105 | ENSP00000499653 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | c.*3251G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 89/104 | 5 | ENSP00000499659 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
176
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000951 AC: 236AN: 248232Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 136AN XY: 134658
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
236
AN:
248232
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
136
AN XY:
134658
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00227 AC: 3315AN: 1461506Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00221 AC XY: 1609AN XY: 727010
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3315
AN:
1461506
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1609
AN XY:
727010
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00119 AC XY: 89AN XY: 74496
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
176
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
74496
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 19, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 06, 2023 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 09, 2015 | p.Glu4053Glu in exon 90 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (88/65298) o f European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.br oadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs41267517). - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 30, 2018 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 30, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at