1-241497940-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000143.4(FH):​c.1421C>G​(p.Thr474Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000266 in 1,613,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T474I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000026 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FH
NM_000143.4 missense

Scores

2
8
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
FH (HGNC:3700): (fumarate hydratase) The protein encoded by this gene is an enzymatic component of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, or Krebs cycle, and catalyzes the formation of L-malate from fumarate. It exists in both a cytosolic form and an N-terminal extended form, differing only in the translation start site used. The N-terminal extended form is targeted to the mitochondrion, where the removal of the extension generates the same form as in the cytoplasm. It is similar to some thermostable class II fumarases and functions as a homotetramer. Mutations in this gene can cause fumarase deficiency and lead to progressive encephalopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 14 uncertain in NM_000143.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.11294752).
BP6
Variant 1-241497940-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-241497940-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41585.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000026 (38/1461698) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000857 (34/39668). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00063. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FHNM_000143.4 linkc.1421C>G p.Thr474Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 10 ENST00000366560.4 NP_000134.2 P07954-1A0A0S2Z4C3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FHENST00000366560.4 linkc.1421C>G p.Thr474Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 10 1 NM_000143.4 ENSP00000355518.4 P07954-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152106
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000136
AC:
34
AN:
249318
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000126
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
134978
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000260
AC:
38
AN:
1461698
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000275
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
727152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000857
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152106
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.0000988
AC:
12

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 474 of the FH protein (p.Thr474Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs369802820, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with FH-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41585). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed for this missense variant. However, the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on FH protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Aug 14, 2023
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Observed in 1/572 individuals with atherosclerosis undergoing whole exome sequencing with no specific information about cancer history (PMID: 22703879); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 36773955, 22703879) -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Fumarase deficiency Uncertain:3
Jan 01, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer Benign:3
Aug 26, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Oct 05, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

FH-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 21, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.074
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.10
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.33
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.28
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.44
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.060
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.0052
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Benign
0.037
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T
Polyphen
0.50
P
Vest4
0.48
MutPred
0.51
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0104);
MVP
0.94
MPC
0.42
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
5.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.68
gMVP
0.93

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs369802820; hg19: chr1-241661240; COSMIC: COSV63818400; API