1-243271036-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000366541.8(SDCCAG8):c.279G>A(p.Pro93=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00207 in 1,612,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 20 hom. )
Consequence
SDCCAG8
ENST00000366541.8 synonymous
ENST00000366541.8 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.642
Genes affected
SDCCAG8 (HGNC:10671): (SHH signaling and ciliogenesis regulator SDCCAG8) This gene encodes a centrosome associated protein. This protein may be involved in organizing the centrosome during interphase and mitosis. Mutations in this gene are associated with retinal-renal ciliopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 1-243271036-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-243271036-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 260011.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-243271036-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-243271036-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.642 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0014 (213/152128) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00828 (40/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00625. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 106 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 20 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCCAG8 | NM_006642.5 | c.279G>A | p.Pro93= | synonymous_variant | 3/18 | ENST00000366541.8 | NP_006633.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCCAG8 | ENST00000366541.8 | c.279G>A | p.Pro93= | synonymous_variant | 3/18 | 1 | NM_006642.5 | ENSP00000355499 | P1 | |
SDCCAG8 | ENST00000482234.1 | n.12G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/6 | 3 | |||||
SDCCAG8 | ENST00000490065.5 | n.432G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/5 | 4 | |||||
SDCCAG8 | ENST00000491888.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00141 AC: 215AN: 152010Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
215
AN:
152010
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00245 AC: 617AN: 251360Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00284 AC XY: 386AN XY: 135846
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
617
AN:
251360
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
386
AN XY:
135846
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00214 AC: 3119AN: 1460826Hom.: 20 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00235 AC XY: 1709AN XY: 726792
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3119
AN:
1460826
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
1709
AN XY:
726792
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00140 AC: 213AN: 152128Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00143 AC XY: 106AN XY: 74380
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
213
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
106
AN XY:
74380
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 19, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | SDCCAG8: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
SDCCAG8-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 09, 2021 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Senior-Loken syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Senior-Loken syndrome 7;C3889474:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at