1-24364225-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_198174.3(GRHL3):c.1735C>T(p.Pro579Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000427 in 1,544,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198174.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- van der Woude syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- van der Woude syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198174.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STPG1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.738-3184G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000337461.4 | Q5TH74-1 | |||
| STPG1 | TSL:1 | n.4211-3184G>A | intron | N/A | |||||
| GRHL3 | TSL:2 | c.1735C>T | p.Pro579Ser | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000288955.5 | Q8TE85-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000350 AC: 5AN: 142780 AF XY: 0.0000260 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000359 AC: 50AN: 1392328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000321 AC XY: 22AN XY: 686418 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74496 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at