1-26951461-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_152365.3(KDF1):c.920G>A(p.Arg307Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,550 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R307P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152365.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ectodermal dysplasia 12, hypohidrotic/hair/tooth/nail typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- autosomal dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_152365.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDF1 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.920G>A | p.Arg307Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000319179.5 | Q8NAX2 | ||
| KDF1 | c.920G>A | p.Arg307Gln | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000536958.1 | ||||
| KDF1 | c.920G>A | p.Arg307Gln | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000536959.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251032 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461550Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727044 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at