1-30715172-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000373765.5(MATN1):āc.1345A>Cā(p.Lys449Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00175 in 1,614,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000373765.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATN1 | NM_002379.3 | c.1345A>C | p.Lys449Gln | missense_variant | 6/8 | ENST00000373765.5 | NP_002370.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MATN1 | ENST00000373765.5 | c.1345A>C | p.Lys449Gln | missense_variant | 6/8 | 1 | NM_002379.3 | ENSP00000362870 | P1 | |
MATN1 | ENST00000494561.1 | n.365A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00697 AC: 1061AN: 152198Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00256 AC: 644AN: 251420Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00213 AC XY: 290AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00120 AC: 1759AN: 1461874Hom.: 15 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00110 AC XY: 799AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00704 AC: 1072AN: 152316Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00694 AC XY: 517AN XY: 74488
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at