1-31372839-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_004102.5(FABP3):c.73+103G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.047 in 1,162,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,483 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004102.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004102.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FABP3 | NM_004102.5 | MANE Select | c.73+103G>C | intron | N/A | NP_004093.1 | |||
| FABP3 | NM_001320996.2 | c.73+103G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001307925.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FABP3 | ENST00000373713.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.73+103G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000362817.2 | |||
| FABP3 | ENST00000970076.1 | c.73+103G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000640135.1 | ||||
| FABP3 | ENST00000915558.1 | c.73+103G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000585617.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0606 AC: 9227AN: 152152Hom.: 544 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0450 AC: 45448AN: 1010722Hom.: 2934 AF XY: 0.0503 AC XY: 26159AN XY: 520228 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0608 AC: 9257AN: 152270Hom.: 549 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0661 AC XY: 4920AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at