1-32780244-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_003680.4(YARS1):c.1175T>G(p.Ile392Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I392T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003680.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate CInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- neurologic, endocrine, and pancreatic disease, multisystem, infantile-onset 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YARS1 | NM_003680.4 | c.1175T>G | p.Ile392Ser | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 13 | ENST00000373477.9 | NP_003671.1 | |
YARS1 | XM_011542347.3 | c.545T>G | p.Ile182Ser | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 11 | XP_011540649.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251422 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at