1-38874747-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_030772.5(GJA9):c.1352C>T(p.Thr451Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00474 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 262 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030772.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA9 | NM_030772.5 | c.1352C>T | p.Thr451Ile | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000357771.5 | NP_110399.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA9 | ENST00000357771.5 | c.1352C>T | p.Thr451Ile | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_030772.5 | ENSP00000350415.3 | ||
ENSG00000274944 | ENST00000621281.1 | c.37-1657C>T | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000479064.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0232 AC: 3534AN: 152138Hom.: 139 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00643 AC: 1618AN: 251472Hom.: 45 AF XY: 0.00486 AC XY: 661AN XY: 135908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00282 AC: 4116AN: 1461892Hom.: 122 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00248 AC XY: 1805AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0233 AC: 3542AN: 152256Hom.: 140 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0232 AC XY: 1726AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 19, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at