1-40091361-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000310.4(PPT1):​c.401T>C​(p.Ile134Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0518 in 1,613,744 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,964 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I134S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.047 ( 303 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.052 ( 2661 hom. )

Consequence

PPT1
NM_000310.4 missense

Scores

3
11

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.689

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PPT1 (HGNC:9325): (palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a small glycoprotein involved in the catabolism of lipid-modified proteins during lysosomal degradation. The encoded enzyme removes thioester-linked fatty acyl groups such as palmitate from cysteine residues. Defects in this gene are a cause of infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1 (CLN1, or INCL) and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 4 (CLN4). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
PPT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0022164583).
BP6
Variant 1-40091361-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-40091361-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130022.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.119 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000310.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PPT1
NM_000310.4
MANE Select
c.401T>Cp.Ile134Thr
missense
Exon 4 of 9NP_000301.1
PPT1
NM_001363695.2
c.401T>Cp.Ile134Thr
missense
Exon 4 of 8NP_001350624.1
PPT1
NM_001142604.2
c.125-1849T>C
intron
N/ANP_001136076.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
PPT1
ENST00000642050.2
MANE Select
c.401T>Cp.Ile134Thr
missense
Exon 4 of 9ENSP00000493153.1
PPT1
ENST00000433473.8
TSL:1
c.398T>Cp.Ile133Thr
missense
Exon 4 of 9ENSP00000394863.4
PPT1
ENST00000530704.6
TSL:1
n.401T>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 4 of 9ENSP00000431655.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0468
AC:
7115
AN:
152088
Hom.:
303
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00961
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0334
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.123
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.127
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.144
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0470
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0416
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0659
AC:
16560
AN:
251240
AF XY:
0.0698
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00972
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0357
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0483
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0579
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0523
AC:
76456
AN:
1461538
Hom.:
2661
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0548
AC XY:
39880
AN XY:
727100
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00938
AC:
314
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0355
AC:
1587
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0319
AC:
834
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.125
AC:
4957
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.118
AC:
10188
AN:
86226
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.130
AC:
6968
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0484
AC:
279
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0434
AC:
48253
AN:
1111722
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0509
AC:
3076
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3902
7804
11705
15607
19509
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1842
3684
5526
7368
9210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0468
AC:
7117
AN:
152206
Hom.:
303
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0535
AC XY:
3980
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00963
AC:
400
AN:
41552
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0351
AC:
536
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0334
AC:
116
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.123
AC:
637
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.127
AC:
612
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.144
AC:
1523
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0340
AC:
10
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0470
AC:
3195
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0412
AC:
87
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
331
661
992
1322
1653
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
84
168
252
336
420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0466
Hom.:
751
Bravo
AF:
0.0366
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0340
AC:
126
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0348
AC:
134
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0104
AC:
46
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0474
AC:
408
ExAC
AF:
0.0661
AC:
8020
Asia WGS
AF:
0.122
AC:
421
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0447
EpiControl
AF:
0.0429

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 15, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1 Benign:4
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 08, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Dec 15, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 07, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 17, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.62
D
Eigen
Benign
-0.47
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.32
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0022
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.60
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L
PhyloP100
0.69
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Polyphen
0.015
B
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.00074
T
GERP RS
2.4
PromoterAI
0.042
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.093
gMVP
0.39
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800205; hg19: chr1-40557033; COSMIC: COSV65655693; API