1-42746756-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_022356.4(P3H1):āc.2152C>Gā(p.Pro718Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000371 in 1,555,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P718P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022356.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3H1 | NM_022356.4 | c.2152C>G | p.Pro718Ala | missense_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000296388.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3H1 | ENST00000296388.10 | c.2152C>G | p.Pro718Ala | missense_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_022356.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000859 AC: 140AN: 162942Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000660 AC XY: 57AN XY: 86392
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000376 AC: 528AN: 1403220Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000355 AC XY: 246AN XY: 692516
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 21AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 20, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2021 | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
P3H1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 21, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at