1-42746756-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):ā€‹c.2152C>Gā€‹(p.Pro718Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000371 in 1,555,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P718P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00038 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.717
Variant links:
Genes affected
P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0031007528).
BP6
Variant 1-42746756-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42746756-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194557.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000322 (49/152300) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00889 (46/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00685. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 21 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
P3H1NM_022356.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2152C>G p.Pro718Ala missense_variant 15/15 ENST00000296388.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
P3H1ENST00000296388.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2152C>G p.Pro718Ala missense_variant 15/151 NM_022356.4 P1Q32P28-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000322
AC:
49
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00887
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000859
AC:
140
AN:
162942
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000660
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
86392
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000399
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000171
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000155
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000440
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000376
AC:
528
AN:
1403220
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000355
AC XY:
246
AN XY:
692516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000278
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0134
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000627
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000185
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000361
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000322
AC:
49
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00889
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Bravo
AF:
0.000438
ExAC
AF:
0.000633
AC:
70
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 20, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 15, 2021- -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 22, 2024- -
Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
P3H1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 21, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.051
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.70
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.12
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.93
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.94
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.23
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.49
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0031
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.82
N
REVEL
Benign
0.046
Sift
Benign
0.11
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.83
T
Polyphen
0.10
B
Vest4
0.19
MutPred
0.096
Loss of glycosylation at P718 (P = 0.0164);
MVP
0.24
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
2.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.031

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs533729683; hg19: chr1-43212427; API