1-45334474-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_001128425.2(MUTYH):​c.74G>A​(p.Gly25Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000441 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G25A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001128425.2 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.25

Publications

41 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]
MUTYH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial adenomatous polyposis 2
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P
  • colorectal cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029941201).
BP6
Variant 1-45334474-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45334474-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 41763.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000578 (88/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0137 (71/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0111. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 58 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MUTYHNM_001128425.2 linkc.74G>A p.Gly25Asp missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 ENST00000710952.2 NP_001121897.1
MUTYHNM_001048174.2 linkc.32G>A p.Gly11Asp missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 ENST00000456914.7 NP_001041639.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MUTYHENST00000710952.2 linkc.74G>A p.Gly25Asp missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 NM_001128425.2 ENSP00000518552.2
MUTYHENST00000456914.7 linkc.32G>A p.Gly11Asp missense_variant Exon 2 of 16 1 NM_001048174.2 ENSP00000407590.2
ENSG00000288208ENST00000671898.1 linkn.578G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 6 of 21 ENSP00000499896.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
269
AN:
251484
AF XY:
0.00104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000427
AC:
624
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000439
AC XY:
319
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0110
AC:
438
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00134
AC:
116
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000288
AC:
32
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000613
AC:
37
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
40
80
119
159
199
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000779
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
71
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
11
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000541
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000808
ExAC
AF:
0.00111
AC:
135
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:13Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Uncertain:3Benign:3
Mar 18, 2016
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:reference population

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Nov 13, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Apr 01, 2019
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Aug 21, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The MUTYH c.74G>A (p.Gly25Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.001112 (135/121410 chrs tested), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation (0.013; 114/8654 chrs, including 2 homozygotes). This frequency is about 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MUTYH variant (0.0045644), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. Most of the published reports indicate that c.74G>A co-occurs in cis with c.53C>T (P18L). Although c.[53C>T; 74G>A] haplotype has been reported to be enriched in sporadic CRC pts compared to controls (Chen, 2008), in functional studies both the complex allele and its compounds were shown to retain complementation ability and were considered to be functionally neutral. In addition, several reported CRC pts carried known pathogenic variants (APC c.3595_3596delAA (p.Lys1199Glufs), MSH6 c.3724_3726del (p.Arg1242del) , that could have explain CRC phenotype in these families (Taki, 2016, Ring, 2012). Lastly, several reputable databases/diagnostic centers classified the variant of interest as VUS/ Benign. Taking together, by applying ACMG rules, the variant was classified as Benign.

Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MUTYH: BS1, BS2

Jun 29, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 11, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18422726, 22641385, 22703879, 11295288, 17252231, 30333958, 29879026, 18811933, 16929514, 25820570, 26684191, 26900293, 25980754, 27443514, 26332594, 24728327, 17703316, 27600092, 29330641, 29667044)

Apr 28, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Aug 02, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 1.3% (114/8654) East Asian chromosomes; ClinVar: 4 labs classify as VUS

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Aug 18, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Apr 03, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jun 14, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Gly25Asp variant was identified in the literature in 18 of 896 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.020) from Asian individuals (Korean, Chinese, Japanese) with adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer, and was present in 6 of 944 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) (Chen 2008, Kim 2007, Yanaru-Fujisawa 2008, Zhang 2006). In all these studies, the variant was identified in co-occurrence on the same allele as another MUTYH variant, p.Pro18Leu. Two studies suggest that this haplotype variant allele (containing both p.Pro18Leu and p.Gly25Asp variants) increases the risk of gastric cancer, with significantly higher frequencies of the variant haplotype observed in affected cases than in healthy controls (Chen 2008, Zhang 2006). In addition, a functional study by Chen (2008) found that the haplotype variant allele had a partial effect on protein mitochondrial transport as compared to wild type MUTYH protein. This effect, however, was not found when each variant was tested individually, suggesting an additive effect of the combined variants on the mitochondrial targeting sequences domain of the MUTYH protein. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs75321043) “With allele of Uncertain significance” with a minor allele frequency of 0.003 (1000 Genomes Project), in HGMD, and in the “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”. The p.Gly25 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.37
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.19
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.0
.;.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;L;L;L;.;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
1.3
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.060
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;D;D;T;T
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;T;D;D;D;T;D;D;D;T;T;T;T;T
Vest4
0.33
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
2.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.047
gMVP
0.16
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75321043; hg19: chr1-45800146; COSMIC: COSV107443475; COSMIC: COSV107443475; API