1-45334474-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):​c.32G>A​(p.Gly11Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000441 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 missense

Scores

1
1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029941201).
BP6
Variant 1-45334474-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45334474-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41763.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1, Benign=10, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr1-45334474-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MUTYHNM_001128425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.74G>A p.Gly25Asp missense_variant 2/16 ENST00000710952.2 NP_001121897.1
MUTYHNM_001048174.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.32G>A p.Gly11Asp missense_variant 2/16 ENST00000456914.7 NP_001041639.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MUTYHENST00000710952.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.74G>A p.Gly25Asp missense_variant 2/16 NM_001128425.2 ENSP00000518552
MUTYHENST00000456914.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.32G>A p.Gly11Asp missense_variant 2/161 NM_001048174.2 ENSP00000407590 A1Q9UIF7-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
269
AN:
251484
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00104
AC XY:
142
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000427
AC:
624
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000439
AC XY:
319
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000288
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000613
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000578
AC:
88
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000779
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000671
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000808
ExAC
AF:
0.00111
AC:
135
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 29, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 21, 2017Variant summary: The MUTYH c.74G>A (p.Gly25Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.001112 (135/121410 chrs tested), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation (0.013; 114/8654 chrs, including 2 homozygotes). This frequency is about 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MUTYH variant (0.0045644), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. Most of the published reports indicate that c.74G>A co-occurs in cis with c.53C>T (P18L). Although c.[53C>T; 74G>A] haplotype has been reported to be enriched in sporadic CRC pts compared to controls (Chen, 2008), in functional studies both the complex allele and its compounds were shown to retain complementation ability and were considered to be functionally neutral. In addition, several reported CRC pts carried known pathogenic variants (APC c.3595_3596delAA (p.Lys1199Glufs), MSH6 c.3724_3726del (p.Arg1242del) , that could have explain CRC phenotype in these families (Taki, 2016, Ring, 2012). Lastly, several reputable databases/diagnostic centers classified the variant of interest as VUS/ Benign. Taking together, by applying ACMG rules, the variant was classified as Benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 11, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18422726, 22641385, 22703879, 11295288, 17252231, 30333958, 29879026, 18811933, 16929514, 25820570, 26684191, 26900293, 25980754, 27443514, 26332594, 24728327, 17703316, 27600092, 29330641, 29667044) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 28, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024MUTYH: BS1, BS2 -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Uncertain:3Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterreference populationSoonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical CenterMar 18, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 13, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 02, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 1.3% (114/8654) East Asian chromosomes; ClinVar: 4 labs classify as VUS -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 03, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 18, 2020- -
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Gly25Asp variant was identified in the literature in 18 of 896 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.020) from Asian individuals (Korean, Chinese, Japanese) with adenomatous polyposis or colorectal cancer, and was present in 6 of 944 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) (Chen 2008, Kim 2007, Yanaru-Fujisawa 2008, Zhang 2006). In all these studies, the variant was identified in co-occurrence on the same allele as another MUTYH variant, p.Pro18Leu. Two studies suggest that this haplotype variant allele (containing both p.Pro18Leu and p.Gly25Asp variants) increases the risk of gastric cancer, with significantly higher frequencies of the variant haplotype observed in affected cases than in healthy controls (Chen 2008, Zhang 2006). In addition, a functional study by Chen (2008) found that the haplotype variant allele had a partial effect on protein mitochondrial transport as compared to wild type MUTYH protein. This effect, however, was not found when each variant was tested individually, suggesting an additive effect of the combined variants on the mitochondrial targeting sequences domain of the MUTYH protein. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs75321043) “With allele of Uncertain significance” with a minor allele frequency of 0.003 (1000 Genomes Project), in HGMD, and in the “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”. The p.Gly25 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.37
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.19
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
.;.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
.;.;.;.;.;.;L;L;L;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.060
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;D;D;T;T
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;T;D;D;D;T;D;D;D;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.68, 0.79, 0.34
.;.;.;.;.;.;P;P;.;.;B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
2.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.047
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75321043; hg19: chr1-45800146; API