1-47281006-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001048166.1(STIL):​c.1452C>G​(p.Ser484Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.104 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,299 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S484S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 3186 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.098 ( 10113 hom. )

Consequence

STIL
NM_001048166.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.184

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STIL (HGNC:10879): (STIL centriolar assembly protein) This gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein implicated in regulation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint, a regulatory pathway that monitors chromosome segregation during cell division to ensure the proper distribution of chromosomes to daughter cells. The protein is phosphorylated in mitosis and in response to activation of the spindle checkpoint, and disappears when cells transition to G1 phase. It interacts with a mitotic regulator, and its expression is required to efficiently activate the spindle checkpoint. It is proposed to regulate Cdc2 kinase activity during spindle checkpoint arrest. Chromosomal deletions that fuse this gene and the adjacent locus commonly occur in T cell leukemias, and are thought to arise through illegitimate V-(D)-J recombination events. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
STIL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • holoprosencephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.114).
BP6
Variant 1-47281006-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-47281006-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 160051.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.184 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.345 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
STILNM_001048166.1 linkc.1452C>G p.Ser484Ser synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 17 ENST00000371877.8 NP_001041631.1 Q15468-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
STILENST00000371877.8 linkc.1452C>G p.Ser484Ser synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 17 1 NM_001048166.1 ENSP00000360944.3 Q15468-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.163
AC:
24761
AN:
151954
Hom.:
3186
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.350
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.138
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0908
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0841
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.305
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.177
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0530
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.104
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0768
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.125
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.120
AC:
30058
AN:
251294
AF XY:
0.118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0498
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0883
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.306
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0533
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0793
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.100
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0980
AC:
143303
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
10113
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0998
AC XY:
72566
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.364
AC:
12175
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0549
AC:
2454
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0908
AC:
2374
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.337
AC:
13391
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.171
AC:
14760
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0552
AC:
2947
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.101
AC:
583
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0789
AC:
87722
AN:
1111962
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.114
AC:
6897
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7569
15137
22706
30274
37843
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3598
7196
10794
14392
17990
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.163
AC:
24784
AN:
152072
Hom.:
3186
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.163
AC XY:
12149
AN XY:
74310
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.350
AC:
14487
AN:
41432
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0907
AC:
1385
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0841
AC:
292
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.304
AC:
1569
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.176
AC:
849
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0530
AC:
562
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0986
AC:
29
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0768
AC:
5223
AN:
67996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.124
AC:
262
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
919
1837
2756
3674
4593
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
262
524
786
1048
1310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0688
Hom.:
170
Bravo
AF:
0.175
Asia WGS
AF:
0.222
AC:
773
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0804
EpiControl
AF:
0.0819

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Microcephaly 7, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Apr 11, 2023
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
5.5
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
0.18
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10789505; hg19: chr1-47746678; COSMIC: COSV54548036; API