1-55052712-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_174936.4(PCSK9):​c.720C>T​(p.Gly240Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00457 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G240G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0054 ( 1 hom., cov: 35)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

PCSK9
NM_174936.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.25

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCSK9 (HGNC:20001): (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) This gene encodes a member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family, which includes proteases that process protein and peptide precursors trafficking through regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The encoded protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing event with its prosegment in the ER and is constitutively secreted as an inactive protease into the extracellular matrix and trans-Golgi network. It is expressed in liver, intestine and kidney tissues and escorts specific receptors for lysosomal degradation. It plays a role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]
PCSK9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 1-55052712-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55052712-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 242028.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.25 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0054 (822/152344) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0209 (101/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0176. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 400 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 33 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PCSK9NM_174936.4 linkc.720C>T p.Gly240Gly synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 12 ENST00000302118.5 NP_777596.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCSK9ENST00000302118.5 linkc.720C>T p.Gly240Gly synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 12 1 NM_174936.4 ENSP00000303208.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00539
AC:
820
AN:
152226
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00943
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00507
AC:
1264
AN:
249178
AF XY:
0.00557
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00822
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000900
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00396
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00344
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00449
AC:
6558
AN:
1460824
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
82
AF XY:
0.00490
AC XY:
3559
AN XY:
726728
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00983
AC:
329
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00407
AC:
182
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
32
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
1486
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000362
AC:
19
AN:
52470
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00295
AC:
17
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
4206
AN:
1111956
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00470
AC:
284
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
450
900
1351
1801
2251
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
180
360
540
720
900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00540
AC:
822
AN:
152344
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00537
AC XY:
400
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00941
AC:
391
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00457
AC:
70
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00259
AC:
9
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0209
AC:
101
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00350
AC:
238
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00425
AC:
9
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
45
90
135
180
225
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00282
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00538
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00504

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Jan 02, 2018
Robarts Research Institute, Western University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2017
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2016
Iberoamerican FH Network
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Mar 01, 2016
Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:4
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PCSK9: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 13, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:2
Aug 24, 2022
GENinCode PLC
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 22, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypobetalipoproteinemia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Nov 11, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41297883; hg19: chr1-55518385; API