Menu
GeneBe

1-55052712-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_174936.4(PCSK9):c.720C>T(p.Gly240=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00457 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G240G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0054 ( 1 hom., cov: 35)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

PCSK9
NM_174936.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCSK9 (HGNC:20001): (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) This gene encodes a member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family, which includes proteases that process protein and peptide precursors trafficking through regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The encoded protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing event with its prosegment in the ER and is constitutively secreted as an inactive protease into the extracellular matrix and trans-Golgi network. It is expressed in liver, intestine and kidney tissues and escorts specific receptors for lysosomal degradation. It plays a role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 1-55052712-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55052712-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 242028.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=9, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr1-55052712-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-55052712-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.25 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0054 (822/152344) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0209 (101/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0176. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 400 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 820 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PCSK9NM_174936.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.720C>T p.Gly240= synonymous_variant 5/12 ENST00000302118.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PCSK9ENST00000302118.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.720C>T p.Gly240= synonymous_variant 5/121 NM_174936.4 P2Q8NBP7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00539
AC:
820
AN:
152226
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00943
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00507
AC:
1264
AN:
249178
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00557
AC XY:
753
AN XY:
135204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00822
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000900
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00396
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00344
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00449
AC:
6558
AN:
1460824
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
82
AF XY:
0.00490
AC XY:
3559
AN XY:
726728
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00983
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00407
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00378
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00540
AC:
822
AN:
152344
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00537
AC XY:
400
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00941
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00425
Alfa
AF:
0.00329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00538
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00504

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 02, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchIberoamerican FH NetworkMar 01, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo JorgeMar 01, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRobarts Research Institute, Western UniversityJan 02, 2018- -
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 16, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 13, 2022- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024PCSK9: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 06, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Hypobetalipoproteinemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 11, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 22, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
Cadd
Benign
6.3
Dann
Benign
0.81
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41297883; hg19: chr1-55518385; API