1-63593450-C-G

Position:

chr1-63593450-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_002633.3(PGM1):c.-39C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000986 in 1,612,382 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PGM1
NM_002633.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.143

Variant links:

Genes affected

PGM1 (HGNC:8905): (phosphoglucomutase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is an isozyme of phosphoglucomutase (PGM) and belongs to the phosphohexose mutase family. There are several PGM isozymes, which are encoded by different genes and catalyze the transfer of phosphate between the 1 and 6 positions of glucose. In most cell types, this PGM isozyme is predominant, representing about 90% of total PGM activity. In red cells, PGM2 is a major isozyme. This gene is highly polymorphic. Mutations in this gene cause glycogen storage disease type 14. Alternativley spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified in this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

PGM1 links:

ITGB3BP (HGNC:6157): (integrin subunit beta 3 binding protein) This gene encodes a transcriptional coregulator that binds to and enhances the activity of members of the nuclear receptor families, thyroid hormone receptors and retinoid X receptors. This protein also acts as a corepressor of NF-kappaB-dependent signaling. This protein induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a caspase 2-mediated signaling pathway. This protein is also a component of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant nucleosome associated complex (CENP-NAC) and may be involved in mitotic progression by recruiting the histone H3 variant CENP-A to the centromere. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

ITGB3BP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000506 (77/152288) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00166 (69/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00134. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 35 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PGM1	NM_002633.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.-39C>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/11	ENST00000371084.8	NP_002624.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PGM1	ENST00000371084.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.-39C>G	5_prime_UTR_variant	1/11	1	NM_002633.3	ENSP00000360125	P1	P36871-1
PGM1	ENST00000650546.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-39C>G	5_prime_UTR_variant	1/12			ENSP00000497812
ITGB3BP	ENST00000478138.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.197+75G>C	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000165

AC:

AN:

242192

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000128

AC XY:

AN XY:

132766

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00205

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000175

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000658

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000185

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000562

AC:

AN:

1460094

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000661

AC XY:

AN XY:

726364

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00185

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000813

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000498

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000470

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000564

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000620

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

PGM1-congenital disorder of glycosylation

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

5.7

DANN

Benign

0.71

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over