1-94047009-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 4P and 13B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.2828G>A(p.Arg943Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0406 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,540 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R943G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000350.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCA4 | NM_000350.3 | c.2828G>A | p.Arg943Gln | missense_variant | 19/50 | ENST00000370225.4 | NP_000341.2 | |
ABCA4 | XM_047416704.1 | c.2606G>A | p.Arg869Gln | missense_variant | 18/49 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCA4 | ENST00000370225.4 | c.2828G>A | p.Arg943Gln | missense_variant | 19/50 | 1 | NM_000350.3 | ENSP00000359245.3 | ||
ABCA4 | ENST00000649773.1 | c.2606G>A | p.Arg869Gln | missense_variant | 18/19 | ENSP00000496882.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0291 AC: 4428AN: 152066Hom.: 99 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0302 AC: 7592AN: 251410Hom.: 163 AF XY: 0.0322 AC XY: 4376AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0418 AC: 61092AN: 1461878Hom.: 1442 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0416 AC XY: 30260AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0291 AC: 4430AN: 152184Hom.: 98 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0285 AC XY: 2120AN XY: 74404
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 12, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 26, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:3Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jun 14, 2002 | - - |
Established risk allele, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jun 27, 2022 | This variant was identified together with variant NM_000350.3:c.2588G>C. - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Stargardt disease Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | Sharon lab, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center | Jun 23, 2019 | - - |
Stargardt disease 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Ophthalmo-Genetics Lab, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana | - | - - |
Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Stargardt Disease, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
ABCA4-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cone-Rod Dystrophy, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Macular degeneration Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
MACULAR DEGENERATION, AGE-RELATED, 2, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jun 14, 2002 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at