Menu
GeneBe

1-97515865-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000110.4(DPYD):c.1601G>A(p.Ser534Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0188 in 1,612,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 337 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as drug response (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S534S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 26 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.019 ( 311 hom. )

Consequence

DPYD
NM_000110.4 missense

Scores

1
11
6

Clinical Significance

drug response reviewed by expert panel U:1B:7O:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
DPYD (HGNC:3012): (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) The protein encoded by this gene is a pyrimidine catabolic enzyme and the initial and rate-limiting factor in the pathway of uracil and thymidine catabolism. Mutations in this gene result in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, an error in pyrimidine metabolism associated with thymine-uraciluria and an increased risk of toxicity in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0098076165).
BP6
Variant 1-97515865-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-97515865-C-T is described in ClinVar as [drug_response]. Clinvar id is 100094.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1, drug_response=2}. Variant chr1-97515865-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0137 (2086/152056) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0196 (1330/67912). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0187. There are 26 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1012 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 26 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DPYDNM_000110.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1601G>A p.Ser534Asn missense_variant 13/23 ENST00000370192.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DPYDENST00000370192.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1601G>A p.Ser534Asn missense_variant 13/231 NM_000110.4 P1Q12882-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0137
AC:
2084
AN:
151938
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00396
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0331
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00705
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0173
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0147
AC:
3683
AN:
250562
Hom.:
40
AF XY:
0.0147
AC XY:
1985
AN XY:
135402
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00863
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0175
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0193
AC:
28204
AN:
1460800
Hom.:
311
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0189
AC XY:
13709
AN XY:
726732
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00867
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0196
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0137
AC:
2086
AN:
152056
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0136
AC XY:
1012
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00395
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0331
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0171
Alfa
AF:
0.0197
Hom.:
59
Bravo
AF:
0.0133
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0216
AC:
80
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0202
AC:
78
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00454
AC:
20
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0202
AC:
174
ExAC
AF:
0.0141
AC:
1712
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0246
EpiControl
AF:
0.0240

ClinVar

Significance: drug response
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7Other:3
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 08, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2023DPYD: BS1, BS2 -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyDiasio Lab, Mayo Clinic-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 26, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtAug 03, 2015- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 29, 2016- -
DPYD-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 21, 2024This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
fluorouracil response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panelcurationPharmGKBMar 24, 2021PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity
capecitabine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panelcurationPharmGKBMar 24, 2021PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.42
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.71
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0098
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.31
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.7
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.43
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.014
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.26
MPC
0.055
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.48
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801158; hg19: chr1-97981421; COSMIC: COSV64597757; API