10-104036641-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000494.4(COL17A1):c.3278-9C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.809 in 1,612,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 532,638 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000494.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.730 AC: 110985AN: 151982Hom.: 42104 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.786 AC: 195786AN: 249126Hom.: 78011 AF XY: 0.788 AC XY: 106271AN XY: 134810
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.817 AC: 1193492AN: 1460820Hom.: 490540 Cov.: 61 AF XY: 0.815 AC XY: 592261AN XY: 726700
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.730 AC: 111006AN: 152100Hom.: 42098 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.729 AC XY: 54221AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at