10-10846131-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001326325.2(CELF2):āc.85G>Cā(p.Asp29His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000508 in 984,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 4/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001326325.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELF2 | NM_001326325.2 | c.85G>C | p.Asp29His | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 16 | NP_001313254.1 | ||
CELF2 | XM_047424482.1 | c.85G>C | p.Asp29His | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 16 | XP_047280438.1 | ||
CELF2 | XM_047424483.1 | c.85G>C | p.Asp29His | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 16 | XP_047280439.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELF2 | ENST00000638035 | c.-81G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 2 of 15 | 5 | ENSP00000490401.1 | ||||
CELF2 | ENST00000637215.1 | c.53+47314G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 14 | 5 | ENSP00000490185.1 | ||||
CELF2 | ENST00000636488.1 | c.53+47314G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 13 | 5 | ENSP00000489955.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000360 AC: 3AN: 832658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00000260 AC XY: 1AN XY: 384558
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152020Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74260
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at