10-110781458-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.849C>T(p.Tyr283Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000748 in 1,551,470 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000072 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.638

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

RBM20 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

dilated cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

RBM20 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).

BP6

Variant 10-110781458-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781458-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 179028.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.638 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000985 (15/152336) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.000771 (4/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000263. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 5 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RBM20	NM_001134363.3 link	c.849C>T	p.Tyr283Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14	ENST00000369519.4	NP_001127835.2	Q5T481
RBM20	XM_017016103.3 link	c.684C>T	p.Tyr228Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14		XP_016871592.1
RBM20	XM_017016104.3 link	c.465C>T	p.Tyr155Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14		XP_016871593.1
RBM20	XM_047425116.1 link	c.465C>T	p.Tyr155Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14		XP_047281072.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RBM20	ENST00000369519.4 link	c.849C>T	p.Tyr283Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14	1	NM_001134363.3	ENSP00000358532.3		Q5T481
RBM20	ENST00000718239.1 link	c.849C>T	p.Tyr283Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 14			ENSP00000520684.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000770

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000959

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000137

AC:

AN:

153600

AF XY:

0.0000613

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000253

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000405

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000231

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

101

AN:

1399134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000536

AC XY:

AN XY:

690084

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000949

AC:

AN:

31598

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000280

AC:

AN:

35704

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25182

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00123

AC:

AN:

35738

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000202

AC:

AN:

79236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

49006

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5698

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000111

AC:

AN:

1078974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000431

AC:

AN:

57998

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74508

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000168

AC:

AN:

41566

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000653

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000771

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000949

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000566

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Mar 24, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:2

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Tyr283Tyr in exon 2 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1/584 East Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs187423999). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Mar 27, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

1.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.47

PhyloP100

-0.64

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over