10-110812610-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.2213C>T(p.Pro738Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000242 in 1,551,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P738P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001134363.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.2213C>T | p.Pro738Leu | missense_variant | 9/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.2048C>T | p.Pro683Leu | missense_variant | 9/14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.1829C>T | p.Pro610Leu | missense_variant | 9/14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.1829C>T | p.Pro610Leu | missense_variant | 9/14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000564 AC: 88AN: 156076Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000773 AC XY: 64AN XY: 82748
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000252 AC: 353AN: 1399348Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000335 AC XY: 231AN XY: 690182
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Sep 29, 2014 | Phe738Leu in exon 9 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance due to a lack of evolutionary conservation of the affected amino acid. Of note, >25 mammals, including 6 primates, have a leucine (Leu) at this positio n despite high nearby amino acid conservation, suggesting that this change is to lerated. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 26, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
RBM20-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 07, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 28, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at