10-112180571-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001244949.2(GPAM):c.127A>G(p.Ile43Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.733 in 1,608,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 434,741 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I43F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001244949.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001244949.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPAM | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.127A>G | p.Ile43Val | missense | Exon 4 of 22 | ENSP00000265276.4 | Q9HCL2 | ||
| GPAM | TSL:1 | c.127A>G | p.Ile43Val | missense | Exon 4 of 19 | ENSP00000358433.1 | Q5VW52 | ||
| GPAM | c.127A>G | p.Ile43Val | missense | Exon 4 of 22 | ENSP00000634684.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.767 AC: 116644AN: 151988Hom.: 45610 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.734 AC: 184441AN: 251212 AF XY: 0.731 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.729 AC: 1061827AN: 1456768Hom.: 389079 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.729 AC XY: 528740AN XY: 725044 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.768 AC: 116755AN: 152106Hom.: 45662 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.765 AC XY: 56868AN XY: 74362 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at