Menu
GeneBe

10-119651659-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.-17G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00357 in 1,546,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

BAG3
NM_004281.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0610
Variant links:
Genes affected
BAG3 (HGNC:939): (BAG cochaperone 3) BAG proteins compete with Hip for binding to the Hsc70/Hsp70 ATPase domain and promote substrate release. All the BAG proteins have an approximately 45-amino acid BAG domain near the C terminus but differ markedly in their N-terminal regions. The protein encoded by this gene contains a WW domain in the N-terminal region and a BAG domain in the C-terminal region. The BAG domains of BAG1, BAG2, and BAG3 interact specifically with the Hsc70 ATPase domain in vitro and in mammalian cells. All 3 proteins bind with high affinity to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 and inhibit its chaperone activity in a Hip-repressible manner. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 10-119651659-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-119651659-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136494.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-119651659-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-119651659-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00208 (317/152114) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00308 (209/67952). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00273. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 144 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 317 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BAG3NM_004281.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-17G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/4 ENST00000369085.8
BAG3XM_005270287.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-17G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BAG3ENST00000369085.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.-17G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/41 NM_004281.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00209
AC:
317
AN:
152006
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000676
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00750
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000662
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00261
AC:
490
AN:
187556
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00251
AC XY:
265
AN XY:
105504
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00695
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00409
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00374
AC:
5210
AN:
1394610
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00367
AC XY:
2542
AN XY:
692796
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000592
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00799
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000276
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00270
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00208
AC:
317
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00194
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000674
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00750
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000662
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00474
Alfa
AF:
0.00339
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 18, 2019Variant summary: BAG3 c.-17G>A is located in the untranslated mRNA region upstream of the initiation codon. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 187556 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 104.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BAG3 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.-17G>A in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 25, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 21, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
Cadd
Benign
8.1
Dann
Benign
0.88
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200388926; hg19: chr10-121411171; API