10-119651771-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.96G>T(p.Pro32Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 1,600,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152030Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000169 AC: 40AN: 236360Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000139 AC XY: 18AN XY: 129262
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000182 AC: 263AN: 1448184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000178 AC XY: 128AN XY: 720548
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152030Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74270
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
BAG3: BP4, BP7 -
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at