10-119672353-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.606G>T(p.Pro202Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000747 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 ( 5 hom. )
Consequence
BAG3
NM_004281.4 synonymous
NM_004281.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.531
Genes affected
BAG3 (HGNC:939): (BAG cochaperone 3) BAG proteins compete with Hip for binding to the Hsc70/Hsp70 ATPase domain and promote substrate release. All the BAG proteins have an approximately 45-amino acid BAG domain near the C terminus but differ markedly in their N-terminal regions. The protein encoded by this gene contains a WW domain in the N-terminal region and a BAG domain in the C-terminal region. The BAG domains of BAG1, BAG2, and BAG3 interact specifically with the Hsc70 ATPase domain in vitro and in mammalian cells. All 3 proteins bind with high affinity to the ATPase domain of Hsc70 and inhibit its chaperone activity in a Hip-repressible manner. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 10-119672353-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-119672353-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44786.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-119672353-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.531 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00385 (586/152198) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0138 (574/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0129. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 283 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 586 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.606G>T | p.Pro202Pro | synonymous_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | NP_004272.2 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.606G>T | p.Pro202Pro | synonymous_variant | 3/4 | XP_005270344.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.606G>T | p.Pro202Pro | synonymous_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | ENSP00000358081.4 | ||
BAG3 | ENST00000450186.1 | c.432G>T | p.Pro144Pro | synonymous_variant | 4/5 | 5 | ENSP00000410036.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00386 AC: 587AN: 152080Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
587
AN:
152080
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 276AN: 250684Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000811 AC XY: 110AN XY: 135700
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
276
AN:
250684
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
110
AN XY:
135700
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000424 AC: 620AN: 1461842Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000360 AC XY: 262AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
620
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
262
AN XY:
727230
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00385 AC: 586AN: 152198Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00380 AC XY: 283AN XY: 74388
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
586
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
283
AN XY:
74388
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 28, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | p.Pro202Pro in Exon 03 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 1.3% (48/3738) of Afr ican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74157690). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 02, 2017 | Variant summary: The BAG3 c.606G>T (p.Pro202Pro) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant creates a new site for SRp40. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 152/119150 control chromosomes from ExAC, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.014559 (143/9822). This frequency is about 373 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BAG3 variant (0.0000391), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories in ClinVar have classified this variant as benign/likely benign. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | BAG3: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 19, 2021 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at