10-119676916-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.1362C>T(p.Ile454Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000427 in 1,614,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I454I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1HHInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- myofibrillar myopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen
- myofibrillar myopathy 6Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Charcot-Marie-tooth disease, axonal, type 2JJInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- distal hereditary motor neuropathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004281.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | MANE Select | c.1362C>T | p.Ile454Ile | synonymous | Exon 4 of 4 | NP_004272.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1362C>T | p.Ile454Ile | synonymous | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000358081.4 | ||
| ENSG00000295480 | ENST00000730378.1 | n.397G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 3 | |||||
| ENSG00000295480 | ENST00000730380.1 | n.346G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000636 AC: 16AN: 251410 AF XY: 0.0000442 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000417 AC: 61AN: 1461848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000344 AC XY: 25AN XY: 727224 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74426 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:2
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
BAG3-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at