10-120851486-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_018117.12(WDR11):c.66C>G(p.His22Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000813 in 1,611,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H22P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000040 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WDR11
NM_018117.12 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.71

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WDR11 (HGNC:13831): (WD repeat domain 11) This gene encodes a member of the WD repeat protein family. WD repeats are minimally conserved regions of approximately 40 amino acids typically bracketed by gly-his and trp-asp (GH-WD), which may facilitate formation of heterotrimeric or multiprotein complexes. Members of this family are involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, and gene regulation. This gene is located in the chromosome 10q25-26 region, which is frequently deleted in gliomas and tumors of other tissues, and is disrupted by the t(10;19) translocation rearrangement in glioblastoma cells. The gene location suggests that it is a candidate gene for the tumor suppressor locus. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

WDR11 links:

WDR11-DT (HGNC:27437): (WDR11 divergent transcript)

WDR11-DT links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016449034).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000473 (72/152354) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00168 (70/41588). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00137. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 36 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WDR11	NM_018117.12 link	c.66C>G	p.His22Gln	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 29	ENST00000263461.11	NP_060587.8	Q9BZH6
WDR11	XR_007061973.1 link	n.125C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 20
WDR11	XR_428707.4 link	n.125C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 28
WDR11	XM_005269963.3 link	c.-733C>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 29		XP_005270020.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WDR11	ENST00000263461.11 link	c.66C>G	p.His22Gln	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 29	1	NM_018117.12	ENSP00000263461.5		Q9BZH6
WDR11	ENST00000605543.5 link	n.66C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 22	2		ENSP00000475076.1		S4R451

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00164

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000995

AC:

AN:

241308

AF XY:

0.0000911

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000117

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000930

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000404

AC:

AN:

1459634

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000441

AC XY:

AN XY:

725926

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00129

AC:

AN:

33460

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44572

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26068

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39650

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85696

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52460

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000450

AC:

AN:

1111646

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000829

AC:

AN:

60318

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.466

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152354

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000483

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00168

AC:

AN:

41588

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000653

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000252

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000559

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00136

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000907

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Oct 21, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 22 of the WDR11 protein (p.His22Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs138044064, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WDR11-related conditions. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.069

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.38

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.89

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.043

Eigen

Benign

-0.48

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.21

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.60

LIST_S2

Benign

0.73

M_CAP

Benign

0.050

MetaRNN

Benign

0.016

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.57

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.97

PhyloP100

1.7

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.73

PROVEAN

Benign

1.2

REVEL

Benign

0.26

Sift

Benign

0.83

Sift4G

Benign

0.64

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.083

MutPred

0.41

Gain of catalytic residue at H22 (P = 0.0025);

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.31

ClinPred

0.055

GERP RS

4.6

PromoterAI

0.061

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.23

gMVP

0.51

Mutation Taster

=86/14

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

10-120851486-C-G

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over