10-121479388-C-T

Variant names:

• chr10-121479388-C-T
• rs41294351
• NM_000141.5:c.*469G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):​c.*469G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00966 in 321,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 (61 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 (10 hom.)
• Consequence: FGFR2 NM_000141.5 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.53

Genes affected

FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.21).
• BP6: Variant 10-121479388-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121479388-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 298988.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0541 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FGFR2	NM_000141.5	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 18 of 18	ENST00000358487.10	NP_000132.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FGFR2	ENST00000358487	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 18 of 18	1	NM_000141.5	ENSP00000351276.6
FGFR2	ENST00000457416	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 18 of 18	1		ENSP00000410294.2
FGFR2	ENST00000613048	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 17	5		ENSP00000484154.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369061	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 15 of 15	1		ENSP00000358057.4
FGFR2	ENST00000478859	c.*469G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 17	1		ENSP00000474011.1
FGFR2	ENST00000604236.5	n.*1982G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 17 of 17	1		ENSP00000474109.1
FGFR2	ENST00000604236.5	n.*1982G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 17	1		ENSP00000474109.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369059.5	c.*469G>A		downstream_gene_variant		5		ENSP00000358055.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0168 AC: 2545 AN: 151914 Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0558

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0107

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000500

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0172

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00323 AC: 548 AN: 169552 Hom.: 10 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.00277 AC XY: 239 AN XY: 86384

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0545

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0108

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000759

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00813

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0168 AC: 2559 AN: 152028 Hom.: 61 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0172 AC XY: 1278 AN XY: 74320

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0560

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0107

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000500

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0170

Alfa AF: 0.00816 Hom.: 7

Bravo AF: 0.0193

Asia WGS AF: 0.00435 AC: 15 AN: 3464

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Crouzon syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Jun 30, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Isolated Coronal Synostosis Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.21
CADD	Benign	13
DANN	Benign	0.88

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41294351; hg19: chr10-123238902;