10-121565644-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):c.170C>T(p.Ser57Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00469 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0048 ( 45 hom. )
Consequence
FGFR2
NM_000141.5 missense
NM_000141.5 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.72
Genes affected
FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), FGFR2. . Gene score misZ 2.402 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.4365 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Pfeiffer syndrome type 3, Antley-Bixler syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome type 2, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome type 1, LADD syndrome 1, Pfeiffer syndrome, bent bone dysplasia syndrome 1, Antley-Bixler syndrome without genital anomalies or disordered steroidogenesis, familial scaphocephaly syndrome, McGillivray type, Apert syndrome, LADD syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010395318).
BP6
Variant 10-121565644-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121565644-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134390.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-121565644-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-121565644-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0032 (488/152282) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0191 (92/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0159. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 252 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 Mitochondrial gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR2 | NM_022970.4 | c.170C>T | p.Ser57Leu | missense_variant | 3/18 | ENST00000457416.7 | NP_075259.4 | |
FGFR2 | NM_000141.5 | c.170C>T | p.Ser57Leu | missense_variant | 3/18 | ENST00000358487.10 | NP_000132.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGFR2 | ENST00000457416.7 | c.170C>T | p.Ser57Leu | missense_variant | 3/18 | 1 | NM_022970.4 | ENSP00000410294 | P4 | |
FGFR2 | ENST00000358487.10 | c.170C>T | p.Ser57Leu | missense_variant | 3/18 | 1 | NM_000141.5 | ENSP00000351276 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00321 AC: 488AN: 152164Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
488
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00480 AC: 1206AN: 251476Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00597 AC XY: 812AN XY: 135918
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1206
AN:
251476
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
812
AN XY:
135918
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00485 AC: 7090AN: 1461884Hom.: 45 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00551 AC XY: 4004AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7090
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
4004
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00320 AC: 488AN: 152282Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00338 AC XY: 252AN XY: 74462
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
488
AN:
152282
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
252
AN XY:
74462
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
15
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
36
ExAC
AF:
AC:
600
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 27, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16912704, 24728327, 11781872, 23754559, 26429889) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 11, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 30, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 12, 2016 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
FGFR2-related craniosynostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Crouzon syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Isolated coronal synostosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.;.;.;.;B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at