Menu
GeneBe

10-121598047-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):​c.-236G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.787 in 397,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 125,302 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.74 ( 42959 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.82 ( 82343 hom. )

Consequence

FGFR2
NM_000141.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.40
Variant links:
Genes affected
FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 10-121598047-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121598047-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 299019.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.836 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FGFR2NM_000141.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.-236G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/18 ENST00000358487.10
FGFR2NM_022970.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-236G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/18 ENST00000457416.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FGFR2ENST00000358487.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.-236G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/181 NM_000141.5 A2P21802-1
FGFR2ENST00000457416.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.-236G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/181 NM_022970.4 P4P21802-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.740
AC:
112575
AN:
152046
Hom.:
42956
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.544
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.782
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.735
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.885
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.735
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.836
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.762
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.806
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.842
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.770
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.816
AC:
200473
AN:
245616
Hom.:
82343
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.820
AC XY:
102105
AN XY:
124496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.550
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.709
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.882
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.778
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.848
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.841
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.790
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.740
AC:
112613
AN:
152166
Hom.:
42959
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.738
AC XY:
54880
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.543
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.735
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.885
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.736
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.836
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.762
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.842
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.771
Alfa
AF:
0.820
Hom.:
33527

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Crouzon syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Isolated coronal synostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
1.6
DANN
Benign
0.97

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1047111; hg19: chr10-123357561; API