10-125120308-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001329.4(CTBP2):c.-205-9215T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.886 in 152,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60,050 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001329.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001329.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBP2 | NM_001329.4 | MANE Select | c.-205-9215T>G | intron | N/A | NP_001320.1 | |||
| CTBP2 | NM_001083914.3 | c.-205-9215T>G | intron | N/A | NP_001077383.1 | ||||
| CTBP2 | NM_001290214.3 | c.-102+13204T>G | intron | N/A | NP_001277143.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBP2 | ENST00000337195.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-205-9215T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000338615.5 | |||
| CTBP2 | ENST00000411419.7 | TSL:1 | c.-205-9215T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000410474.2 | |||
| CTBP2 | ENST00000494626.6 | TSL:1 | c.-102+13204T>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000436285.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.886 AC: 134806AN: 152168Hom.: 59998 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.886 AC: 134913AN: 152286Hom.: 60050 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.888 AC XY: 66140AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at