Genetic Variant UROS:p.Pro226Pro (chr10-125788988-G-A) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-3 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBP7

The NM_000375.3(UROS):c.678C>T(p.Pro226Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,612,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

UROS
NM_000375.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.05

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

UROS (HGNC:12592): (uroporphyrinogen III synthase) The protein encoded by this gene catalyzes the fourth step of porphyrin biosynthesis in the heme biosynthetic pathway. Defects in this gene cause congenital erythropoietic porphyria (Gunther's disease). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

UROS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

cutaneous porphyria
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

UROS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 10-125788988-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-125788988-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 2866524.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.05 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000375.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
UROS	NM_000375.3	MANE Select	c.678C>T	p.Pro226Pro	synonymous	Exon 10 of 10	NP_000366.1	A0A0S2Z4T8
UROS	NM_001324036.2		c.759C>T	p.Pro253Pro	synonymous	Exon 11 of 11	NP_001310965.1	A0A3B3ISM6
UROS	NM_001324037.2		c.678C>T	p.Pro226Pro	synonymous	Exon 10 of 10	NP_001310966.1	A0A3B3ITJ2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
UROS	ENST00000368797.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.678C>T	p.Pro226Pro	synonymous	Exon 10 of 10	ENSP00000357787.4	P10746
UROS	ENST00000368786.5	TSL:1	c.678C>T	p.Pro226Pro	synonymous	Exon 9 of 9	ENSP00000357775.1	P10746
UROS	ENST00000940865.1		c.858C>T	p.Pro286Pro	synonymous	Exon 11 of 11	ENSP00000610924.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000811

AC:

AN:

246544

AF XY:

0.00000745

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000181

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000616

AC:

AN:

1460590

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000413

AC XY:

AN XY:

726564

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26122

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86192

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52310

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000630

AC:

AN:

1111954

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74368

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.442

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, single submitter

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

8.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.85

PhyloP100

1.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over