10-131116863-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_174937.4(TCERG1L):c.1331C>A(p.Pro444Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000377 in 1,589,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P444L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_174937.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_174937.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCERG1L | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1331C>A | p.Pro444Gln | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000357631.4 | Q5VWI1 | ||
| TCERG1L | c.1370C>A | p.Pro457Gln | missense | Exon 10 of 13 | ENSP00000605739.1 | ||||
| TCERG1L | TSL:5 | n.3193C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 9 of 12 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000939 AC: 2AN: 213042 AF XY: 0.0000175 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.95e-7 AC: 1AN: 1437856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000140 AC XY: 1AN XY: 712982 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74320 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at