Menu
GeneBe

10-13288402-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006214.4(PHYH):c.636A>G(p.Thr212=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.252 in 1,613,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53,733 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 6431 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.25 ( 47302 hom. )

Consequence

PHYH
NM_006214.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.16
Variant links:
Genes affected
PHYH (HGNC:8940): (phytanoyl-CoA 2-hydroxylase) This gene is a member of the PhyH family and encodes a peroxisomal protein that is involved in the alpha-oxidation of 3-methyl branched fatty acids. Specifically, this protein converts phytanoyl-CoA to 2-hydroxyphytanoyl-CoA. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Refsum disease (RD) and deficient protein activity has been associated with Zellweger syndrome and rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms, have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 10-13288402-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-13288402-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95349.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-13288402-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.388 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PHYHNM_006214.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.636A>G p.Thr212= synonymous_variant 6/9 ENST00000263038.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PHYHENST00000263038.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.636A>G p.Thr212= synonymous_variant 6/91 NM_006214.4 P1O14832-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.280
AC:
42556
AN:
152004
Hom.:
6413
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.393
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.188
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.192
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.229
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.121
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.158
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.276
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.231
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.258
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.233
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.233
AC:
58616
AN:
251216
Hom.:
7676
AF XY:
0.228
AC XY:
30986
AN XY:
135842
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.401
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.188
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0891
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.160
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.283
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.257
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.249
AC:
364641
AN:
1461648
Hom.:
47302
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.246
AC XY:
179092
AN XY:
727116
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.401
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.226
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.146
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.280
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.258
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.240
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.280
AC:
42622
AN:
152122
Hom.:
6431
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.277
AC XY:
20631
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.393
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.229
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.121
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.276
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.258
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.235
Alfa
AF:
0.252
Hom.:
9587
Bravo
AF:
0.278
Asia WGS
AF:
0.165
AC:
571
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.247
EpiControl
AF:
0.236

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 19, 2013- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Phytanic acid storage disease Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 18, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 26, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
Cadd
Benign
1.3
Dann
Benign
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs473407; hg19: chr10-13330402; COSMIC: COSV53816118; COSMIC: COSV53816118; API