10-133282279-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_006659.4(TUBGCP2):c.2353G>A(p.Val785Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000687 in 1,456,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006659.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUBGCP2 | NM_006659.4 | c.2353G>A | p.Val785Ile | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 18 | ENST00000252936.8 | NP_006650.1 | |
TUBGCP2 | NM_001256617.2 | c.2437G>A | p.Val813Ile | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 19 | NP_001243546.1 | ||
TUBGCP2 | NM_001256618.2 | c.1963G>A | p.Val655Ile | missense_variant | Exon 15 of 17 | NP_001243547.1 | ||
TUBGCP2 | NR_046330.2 | n.3073G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 16 of 18 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000123 AC: 3AN: 243980Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000226 AC XY: 3AN XY: 132976
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000687 AC: 10AN: 1456120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000111 AC XY: 8AN XY: 723640
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.2353G>A (p.V785I) alteration is located in exon 16 (coding exon 15) of the TUBGCP2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 2353, causing the valine (V) at amino acid position 785 to be replaced by an isoleucine (I). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at