10-25997230-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.480G>T​(p.Thr160=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0537 in 1,612,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,761 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.095 ( 1226 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.049 ( 2535 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.91
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 10-25997230-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-25997230-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45817.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.91 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.214 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.480G>T p.Thr160= synonymous_variant 6/35 ENST00000642920.2 NP_059129.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.480G>T p.Thr160= synonymous_variant 6/35 NM_017433.5 ENSP00000495965 P1Q8NEV4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0951
AC:
14455
AN:
152034
Hom.:
1219
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0796
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0510
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0835
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0542
AC:
13596
AN:
250992
Hom.:
658
AF XY:
0.0517
AC XY:
7015
AN XY:
135630
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0364
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0575
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00261
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0365
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0541
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0495
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0494
AC:
72135
AN:
1460526
Hom.:
2535
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0487
AC XY:
35363
AN XY:
726644
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0394
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0588
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0312
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0360
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0478
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0536
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0952
AC:
14486
AN:
152150
Hom.:
1226
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0932
AC XY:
6931
AN XY:
74402
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.217
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0663
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0510
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0826
Alfa
AF:
0.0592
Hom.:
494
Bravo
AF:
0.102
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0270
AC:
94
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Thr160Thr in Exon 06 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 21.5% (802/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs12257119). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.090
DANN
Benign
0.35

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12257119; hg19: chr10-26286159; API