10-25997230-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.480G>T​(p.Thr160Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0537 in 1,612,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,761 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T160T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.095 ( 1226 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.049 ( 2535 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.91

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO3A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30
    Inheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal dominant 90
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 10-25997230-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-25997230-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45817.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.91 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.214 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkc.480G>T p.Thr160Thr synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 35 ENST00000642920.2 NP_059129.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkc.480G>T p.Thr160Thr synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 35 NM_017433.5 ENSP00000495965.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0951
AC:
14455
AN:
152034
Hom.:
1219
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0284
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0796
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0510
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0835
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0542
AC:
13596
AN:
250992
AF XY:
0.0517
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0364
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0575
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0365
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0541
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0495
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0494
AC:
72135
AN:
1460526
Hom.:
2535
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0487
AC XY:
35363
AN XY:
726644
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.220
AC:
7359
AN:
33400
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0394
AC:
1763
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0588
AC:
1536
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00134
AC:
53
AN:
39562
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0312
AC:
2692
AN:
86232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0360
AC:
1921
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0763
AC:
439
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0478
AC:
53136
AN:
1111010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0536
AC:
3236
AN:
60342
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3249
6498
9747
12996
16245
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2004
4008
6012
8016
10020
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0952
AC:
14486
AN:
152150
Hom.:
1226
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0932
AC XY:
6931
AN XY:
74402
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.217
AC:
9014
AN:
41474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0663
AC:
1014
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0576
AC:
200
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
10
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0284
AC:
137
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0387
AC:
410
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0788
AC:
23
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0510
AC:
3469
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0826
AC:
174
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
627
1254
1880
2507
3134
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
146
292
438
584
730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0642
Hom.:
749
Bravo
AF:
0.102
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0270
AC:
94
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Thr160Thr in Exon 06 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 21.5% (802/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs12257119).

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.090
DANN
Benign
0.35
PhyloP100
-1.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12257119; hg19: chr10-26286159; COSMIC: COSV108010576; API