10-26067063-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):c.1042A>G(p.Ile348Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.686 in 1,603,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 378,441 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I348L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017433.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30Inheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal dominant 90Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO3A | ENST00000642920.2 | c.1042A>G | p.Ile348Val | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 35 | NM_017433.5 | ENSP00000495965.1 | |||
| MYO3A | ENST00000543632.5 | c.1042A>G | p.Ile348Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 17 | 1 | ENSP00000445909.1 | |||
| MYO3A | ENST00000642197.1 | n.1246A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 11 of 27 | ||||||
| MYO3A | ENST00000647478.1 | n.1042A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 10 of 30 | ENSP00000493932.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.686 AC: 104265AN: 151950Hom.: 35943 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.676 AC: 169513AN: 250758 AF XY: 0.677 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.685 AC: 994667AN: 1451048Hom.: 342464 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.684 AC XY: 494153AN XY: 722420 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.686 AC: 104353AN: 152068Hom.: 35977 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.688 AC XY: 51179AN XY: 74342 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
- -
- -
- -
Ile348Val in Exon 11 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 32.5% (1216/3738) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3824699). -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at