10-26067085-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.1053+11C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.521 in 1,550,540 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 215,466 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.47 ( 17828 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.53 ( 197638 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.23

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO3A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30
    Inheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal dominant 90
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 10-26067085-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26067085-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45793.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.55 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017433.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYO3A
NM_017433.5
MANE Select
c.1053+11C>T
intron
N/ANP_059129.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
MYO3A
ENST00000642920.2
MANE Select
c.1053+11C>T
intron
N/AENSP00000495965.1
MYO3A
ENST00000543632.5
TSL:1
c.1053+11C>T
intron
N/AENSP00000445909.1
MYO3A
ENST00000642197.1
n.1257+11C>T
intron
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.475
AC:
71957
AN:
151626
Hom.:
17823
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.428
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.409
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.535
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.271
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.494
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.579
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.608
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.554
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.477
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.477
AC:
118648
AN:
248680
AF XY:
0.488
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.317
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.527
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.578
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.552
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.503
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.526
AC:
735785
AN:
1398796
Hom.:
197638
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.526
AC XY:
368128
AN XY:
699216
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.358
AC:
11455
AN:
32030
American (AMR)
AF:
0.329
AC:
14615
AN:
44384
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.521
AC:
13350
AN:
25618
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.262
AC:
10271
AN:
39230
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.482
AC:
40814
AN:
84672
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.575
AC:
30496
AN:
53032
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.557
AC:
3131
AN:
5626
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.551
AC:
581664
AN:
1055864
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.514
AC:
29989
AN:
58340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.445
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14073
28146
42219
56292
70365
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
15768
31536
47304
63072
78840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.474
AC:
71975
AN:
151744
Hom.:
17828
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.474
AC XY:
35149
AN XY:
74154
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.359
AC:
14860
AN:
41392
American (AMR)
AF:
0.408
AC:
6235
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.535
AC:
1854
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.272
AC:
1402
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.493
AC:
2377
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.579
AC:
6086
AN:
10516
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.592
AC:
173
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.554
AC:
37598
AN:
67828
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.477
AC:
1003
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1858
3716
5573
7431
9289
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
658
1316
1974
2632
3290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.522
Hom.:
3953
Bravo
AF:
0.451
Asia WGS
AF:
0.398
AC:
1384
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 20, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

1053+11C>T in Intron 11 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seq uence and has been identified in 47.1% (3305/7020) of European American chromoso mes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs .washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3824698).

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jun 22, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.27
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
-1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3824698; hg19: chr10-26356014; COSMIC: COSV56348758; API