10-26173861-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.3597G>A​(p.Glu1199Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.343 in 1,613,704 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 96,361 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 8126 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.35 ( 88235 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.243

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO3A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30
    Inheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal dominant 90
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 10-26173861-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26173861-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45808.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.243 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.421 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkc.3597G>A p.Glu1199Glu synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 35 ENST00000642920.2 NP_059129.3 Q8NEV4-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkc.3597G>A p.Glu1199Glu synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 35 NM_017433.5 ENSP00000495965.1 Q8NEV4-1
MYO3AENST00000543632.5 linkc.1777-37982G>A intron_variant Intron 16 of 16 1 ENSP00000445909.1 F5H0U9
MYO3AENST00000647478.1 linkn.*1393+3322G>A intron_variant Intron 27 of 29 ENSP00000493932.1 A0A2R8Y4D5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.322
AC:
48918
AN:
151966
Hom.:
8128
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.253
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.231
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.314
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.350
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.332
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.437
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.389
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.436
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.345
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.326
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.343
AC:
85835
AN:
250344
AF XY:
0.350
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.249
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.296
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.354
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.321
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.393
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.342
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.353
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.346
AC:
505288
AN:
1461620
Hom.:
88235
Cov.:
48
AF XY:
0.349
AC XY:
253405
AN XY:
727090
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.255
AC:
8540
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.300
AC:
13429
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.348
AC:
9103
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.344
AC:
13664
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.419
AC:
36163
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.386
AC:
20549
AN:
53256
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.437
AC:
2520
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.342
AC:
380461
AN:
1111930
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.345
AC:
20859
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19510
39020
58530
78040
97550
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12184
24368
36552
48736
60920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.322
AC:
48924
AN:
152084
Hom.:
8126
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.326
AC XY:
24202
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.253
AC:
10480
AN:
41496
American (AMR)
AF:
0.314
AC:
4794
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.350
AC:
1216
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.332
AC:
1716
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.437
AC:
2105
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.389
AC:
4109
AN:
10560
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.418
AC:
122
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.346
AC:
23480
AN:
67958
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.327
AC:
691
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1711
3423
5134
6846
8557
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
506
1012
1518
2024
2530
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.337
Hom.:
34021
Bravo
AF:
0.305
Asia WGS
AF:
0.369
AC:
1280
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.354
EpiControl
AF:
0.348

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Glu1199Glu in Exon 30 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 34.1% (2393/7020) o f European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Seque ncing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3740232). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.67
DANN
Benign
0.39
PhyloP100
0.24
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3740232; hg19: chr10-26462790; COSMIC: COSV56323746; API