10-42784506-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_014753.4(BMS1):c.112C>T(p.Arg38Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R38R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014753.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- aplasia cutis congenitaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014753.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMS1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.112C>T | p.Arg38Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000363642.4 | Q14692 | ||
| BMS1 | c.112C>T | p.Arg38Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 24 | ENSP00000547483.1 | ||||
| BMS1 | c.112C>T | p.Arg38Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000636950.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000789 AC: 120AN: 152176Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00218 AC: 548AN: 251032 AF XY: 0.00276 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00124 AC: 1809AN: 1461582Hom.: 23 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00160 AC XY: 1163AN XY: 727096 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000795 AC: 121AN: 152294Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000927 AC XY: 69AN XY: 74462 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at